CRITICAL APPRAISAL
PODCAST GENEALOGY IN NIGERIA, DEVELOPED COUNTRIES, AND INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES
Abstract
The advent of the digital age has ushered in a transformative medium that is reshaping how we consume information, share stories, and engage with diverse content. Podcasting has emerged as a powerful and accessible platform, challenging traditional broadcasting and amplifying voices from around the world. This critical appraisal delves into the genealogy of podcasts, examining the unique dynamics of podcasting in Nigeria, comparing it to developed countries, and presenting international perspectives. It aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of how podcasting has evolved and the challenges and opportunities it has encountered in diverse settings. The analysis begins by recognizing podcasting as a global phenomenon, transcending geographical boundaries. It explores how the rise of podcasting is not merely an echo of the digital advancement of developed countries but a global chorus of voices, each with its unique message and cadence. International perspectives unveil a world where podcasting has been embraced in diverse nations, reflecting the cultural tapestry, social dynamics, and evolving media consumption habits of each region. The comparative analysis between podcasting in developed countries, particularly the United States, and its evolution in Nigeria offers a compelling contrast. Nigeria's podcasting journey arrived later on the scene, allowing local creators to adapt to the unique preferences and cultural context of their audience. The adaptability and responsiveness of Nigerian podcasters to local needs showcase the medium's transformative potential. Furthermore, this critical appraisal highlights the distinct challenges faced by podcasting in Nigeria, including limited high-speed internet infrastructure and innovative monetization strategies. These challenges have led to creative solutions, underscoring the resilience and ingenuity of Nigerian podcasters. In contrast, developed countries have established regulatory frameworks that provide security and credibility but can sometimes stifle freedom of expression, sparking ongoing debates about the balance between regulation and freedom.